Answer:
1.5 cars
Explanation:
Three employees can produce a total of:
= 4 × 3
= 12 cars in an hour.
Five employees can produce a total of:
= 3 × 5
= 15 cars in an hour
So, the increase in total product of labor as I increase the labor from 3 to 5 employees:
= Total product when 5 employees are hired - Total products when 3 employees are hired
= 15 - 12
= 3 cars.
So, the marginal product of moving from 3 to 5 workers:
= 3 ÷ 2
= 1.5 cars
Answer and Explanation:
An investment when it would be risk free in that case both the principal and the interest amount are to be paid within the prescribed time. Also when the U.S government bonds i.e. long term would be issued by the government have a lesser interest rate as compared with the other riskier securities available at the market place this is because as the government would default next to zero in case of the short term it would make the default when there are extreme situations arise.
Therefore in the short term it would be risk free
But in the long run, the person is based on the treasury bills returns so that he or she could equate the similar standard of living also it would not suffice when the inflation rises
Therefore the less risky investment would be of Government bonds
Answer:
$1,952 (Positive NPV)
Explanation:
Year Annual CF ($) PV factor at 10.30% PV of Cash Flow ($)
1 17,000 0.90662 15,413
2 17,000 0.82196 13,973
3 17,000 0.74520 12,668
4 17,000 0.67561 11,485
5 17,000 0.61252 10,413
6 17,000 0.55532 9,441
7 17,000 0.50347 8,559
TOTAL 1.73554 81,952
Net Present Value (NPV) = Present value of annual cash flows - Initial Cost
Net Present Value (NPV) = $81,952 - $80,000
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1,952 (Positive NPV)
It will be weaker. According to Hering’s opponent-process model, our eyes will experience a certain level of fatigue after observing a certain object for a prolonged period of time. This level of fatigue usually happen only temporarily and you could experience the same level of color distinguish if you let your eyes rest for a while.
Answer:
a common resource when it is congested, but it is a public good when it is not congested.
Explanation:
We live in different areas, across city streets, with roads and they can either be public goods or common resources. Now, when the streets are not congested, it simply means that an individual can freely access the areas without that affecting any other person. In this simple case, the use by one person is not in rival consumption and so the streets are said to be a public good. But when the area is fully congested, people might find it difficult to move around through the areas. The use of the areas could cause negative externalities. Because the place would be overcrowded, people can only move at a slow pace. In this case, the street are said to be a common resource.
