1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ierofanga [76]
3 years ago
8

Please Help, I can't figure out this problem

Mathematics
1 answer:
Otrada [13]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<h2>The answer is 5 units</h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between two points can be found by using the formula

d  =  \sqrt{ ({x1 - x2})^{2} +  ({y1 - y2})^{2}  }  \\

where

(x1 , y1) and (x2 , y2) are the points

From the question

The points are (9,-7) and (5, -4)

The distance between them is

d =  \sqrt{ ({9 - 5})^{2} +  ({ - 7 + 4})^{2}  }  \\  =  \sqrt{ {4}^{2}  +  ({ - 3})^{2} }  \\  =  \sqrt{16 + 9}  \\  =  \sqrt{25}

We have the final answer as

<h3>5 units</h3>

Hope this helps you

You might be interested in
In Case Study 19.1, we learned that about 56% of American adults actually voted in the presidential election of 1992, whereas ab
Radda [10]

Answer:

a) Confidence interval for 68% confidence level

= (0.548, 0.572)

Confidence interval for 95% confidence level

= (0.536, 0.584)

Confidence interval for 99.99% confidence level = (0.523, 0.598)

b) The sample proportion of 0.61 is unusual as falls outside all of the range of intervals where the sample mean can found for all 3 confidence levels examined.

c) Standardized score for the reported percentage using a sample size of 400 = 2.02

Since, most of the variables in a normal distribution should fall within 2 standard deviations of the mean, a sample mean that corresponds to standard deviation of 2.02 from the population mean makes it seem very plausible that the people that participated in this sample weren't telling the truth. At least, the mathematics and myself, do not believe that they were telling the truth.

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean of this sample distribution is

Mean = μₓ = np = 0.61 × 1600 = 976

But the sample mean according to the population mean should have been

Sample mean = population mean = nP

= 0.56 × 1600 = 896.

To find the interval of values where the sample proportion should fall 68%, 95%, and almost all of the time, we obtain confidence interval for those confidence levels. Because, that's basically what the definition of confidence interval is; an interval where the true value can be obtained to a certain level.of confidence.

We will be doing the calculations in sample proportions,

We will find the confidence interval for confidence level of 68%, 95% and almost all of the time (99.7%).

Basically the empirical rule of 68-95-99.7 for standard deviations 1, 2 and 3 from the mean.

Confidence interval = (Sample mean) ± (Margin of error)

Sample Mean = population mean = 0.56

Margin of Error = (critical value) × (standard deviation of the distribution of sample means)

Standard deviation of the distribution of sample means = √[p(1-p)/n] = √[(0.56×0.44)/1600] = 0.0124

Critical value for 68% confidence interval

= 0.999 (from the z-tables)

Critical value for 95% confidence interval

= 1.960 (also from the z-tables)

Critical values for the 99.7% confidence interval = 3.000 (also from the z-tables)

Confidence interval for 68% confidence level

= 0.56 ± (0.999 × 0.0124)

= 0.56 ± 0.0124

= (0.5476, 0.5724)

Confidence interval for 95% confidence level

= 0.56 ± (1.960 × 0.0124)

= 0.56 ± 0.0243

= (0.5357, 0.5843)

Confidence interval for 99.7% confidence level

= 0.56 ± (3.000 × 0.0124)

= 0.56 ± 0.0372

= (0.5228, 0.5972)

b) Based on the obtained intervals for the range of intervals that can contain the sample mean for 3 different confidence levels, the sample proportion of 0.61 is unusual as it falls outside of all the range of intervals where the sample mean can found for all 3 confidence levels examined.

c) Now suppose that the sample had been of only 400 people. Compute a standardized score to correspond to the reported percentage of 61%. Comment on whether or not you believe that people in the sample could all have been telling the truth, based on your result.

The new standard deviation of the distribution of sample means for a sample size of 400

√[p(1-p)/n] = √[(0.56×0.44)/400] = 0.0248

The standardized score for any is the value minus the mean then divided by the standard deviation.

z = (x - μ)/σ = (0.61 - 0.56)/0.0248 = 2.02

Standardized score for the reported percentage using a sample size of 400 = 2.02

Since, most of the variables in a normal distribution should fall within 2 standard deviations of the mean, a sample mean that corresponds to standard deviation of 2.02 from the population mean makes it seem very plausible that the people that participated in this sample weren't telling the truth. At least, the mathematics and myself, do not believe that they were telling the truth.

Hope this Helps!!!

7 0
3 years ago
Solve these recurrence relations together with the initial conditions given. a) an= an−1+6an−2 for n ≥ 2, a0= 3, a1= 6 b) an= 7a
8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

  • a) 3/5·((-2)^n + 4·3^n)
  • b) 3·2^n - 5^n
  • c) 3·2^n + 4^n
  • d) 4 - 3 n
  • e) 2 + 3·(-1)^n
  • f) (-3)^n·(3 - 2n)
  • g) ((-2 - √19)^n·(-6 + √19) + (-2 + √19)^n·(6 + √19))/√19

Step-by-step explanation:

These homogeneous recurrence relations of degree 2 have one of two solutions. Problems a, b, c, e, g have one solution; problems d and f have a slightly different solution. The solution method is similar, up to a point.

If there is a solution of the form a[n]=r^n, then it will satisfy ...

  r^n=c_1\cdot r^{n-1}+c_2\cdot r^{n-2}

Rearranging and dividing by r^{n-2}, we get the quadratic ...

  r^2-c_1r-c_2=0

The quadratic formula tells us values of r that satisfy this are ...

  r=\dfrac{c_1\pm\sqrt{c_1^2+4c_2}}{2}

We can call these values of r by the names r₁ and r₂.

Then, for some coefficients p and q, the solution to the recurrence relation is ...

  a[n]=pr_1^n+qr_2^n

We can find p and q by solving the initial condition equations:

\left[\begin{array}{cc}1&1\\r_1&r_2\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}p\\q\end{array}\right] =\left[\begin{array}{c}a[0]\\a[1]\end{array}\right]

These have the solution ...

p=\dfrac{a[0]r_2-a[1]}{r_2-r_1}\\\\q=\dfrac{a[1]-a[0]r_1}{r_2-r_1}

_____

Using these formulas on the first recurrence relation, we get ...

a)

c_1=1,\ c_2=6,\ a[0]=3,\ a[1]=6\\\\r_1=\dfrac{1+\sqrt{1^2+4\cdot 6}}{2}=3,\ r_2=\dfrac{1-\sqrt{1^2+4\cdot 6}}{2}=-2\\\\p=\dfrac{3(-2)-6}{-5}=\dfrac{12}{5},\ q=\dfrac{6-3(3)}{-5}=\dfrac{3}{5}\\\\a[n]=\dfrac{3}{5}(-2)^n+\dfrac{12}{5}3^n

__

The rest of (b), (c), (e), (g) are solved in exactly the same way. A spreadsheet or graphing calculator can ease the process of finding the roots and coefficients for the given recurrence constants. (It's a matter of plugging in the numbers and doing the arithmetic.)

_____

For problems (d) and (f), the quadratic has one root with multiplicity 2. So, the formulas for p and q don't work and we must do something different. The generic solution in this case is ...

  a[n]=(p+qn)r^n

The initial condition equations are now ...

\left[\begin{array}{cc}1&0\\r&r\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}p\\q\end{array}\right] =\left[\begin{array}{c}a[0]\\a[1]\end{array}\right]

and the solutions for p and q are ...

p=a[0]\\\\q=\dfrac{a[1]-a[0]r}{r}

__

Using these formulas on problem (d), we get ...

d)

c_1=2,\ c_2=-1,\ a[0]=4,\ a[1]=1\\\\r=\dfrac{2+\sqrt{2^2+4(-1)}}{2}=1\\\\p=4,\ q=\dfrac{1-4(1)}{1}=-3\\\\a[n]=4-3n

__

And for problem (f), we get ...

f)

c_1=-6,\ c_2=-9,\ a[0]=3,\ a[1]=-3\\\\r=\dfrac{-6+\sqrt{6^2+4(-9)}}{2}=-3\\\\p=3,\ q=\dfrac{-3-3(-3)}{-3}=-2\\\\a[n]=(3-2n)(-3)^n

_____

<em>Comment on problem g</em>

Yes, the bases of the exponential terms are conjugate irrational numbers. When the terms are evaluated, they do resolve to rational numbers.

6 0
3 years ago
Mentally estimate the total cost of items that have the following prices $1.85 $.98 $3.94 $9.78 and $6.18 round off the answer t
velikii [3]

the first 4 would be rounded up tot he nearest dollar and the last one rounded down to the nearest dollar

 doing that I estimate $23.00

Answer is C


7 0
3 years ago
What is the value of the digit 4 in 46000?
IgorC [24]
I think it is the tens because the first is ten thousand, second is thousand, third is hundreds and last is units ones
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can I find c in a=3 b=4
Dahasolnce [82]
A^2+b^2= c^2
3^2+4^2=c^2
9+16=c^2
25=c^2
5=c
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the equation of a line, in slope-intercept form of a line that passes through the point (9, 2) and is perpendicular to the
    12·2 answers
  • What lowest terms fraction is equal to 15%?
    10·1 answer
  • The slope of the line containing the points (-5, 3) and (-2, 1) is
    14·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE
    8·1 answer
  • Given that OT =5, XT=12, and OX= 13 is XY tangent to circle O at T? Explain.
    13·1 answer
  • Smh, what is this. If you answer this, please add a prove it statement. Thank you.​
    13·1 answer
  • 3 mm<br> 4 mm<br> What is the length of the hypotenuse?<br> C =<br> millimeters
    13·2 answers
  • For each sequence, determine whether it appears to be
    11·1 answer
  • Here is another if you answer first you get a brainlist SIMPLe
    11·1 answer
  • Answer ASAP PLS -
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!