Answer: D is correct.
Explanation: laws of reason are mere fictions. Philosophy of rights is dedicated to this issue but in its very fundaments there are fundamental questions that are still not answered (becase both laws of nature and laws of reason are products of human intellect, i.e. they cannot be experimentally proved. In spite of its fictitious nature, theese laws became one of the pillars of Enlightenment. French philophers, for example, attempted to ground ethics on mathematics which proved to be inviable.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I think it's C but please let me know if I'm wrong
The Romans invented a law code detailing the rights and duties of citizens and defined the legal process.
The legal system we use today is very mostly based on Roman laws. They included the rights and duties of citizens which did in fact define the legal process and is widely used in common law. The Western governments used many Roman law ideas and it outlines how we deal with law today.
The 2 conflicting sides was Christianity VS Evolution in this time period pretty much everyone was a supporter of Christianity and it was unholy to talk about anything that went against it.A substitute high school teacher John T Scopes apparently taught some evolution. He was then taken to court he claims he didnt actually teach human evolution but he purposely submitted to self incrimination ( to draw publicity) he was then fined 100$ The answer to your question Is Christianity VS Human Evolution
