This would be a general partnership because both parties are responsible equally.
Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
The similarity of negative growth rate and zero growth rate is that there is no growth towards a positive output. For example, if the business is currently in either state, it is not earning. It may be very stagnant (for zero growth rate) or losing (for negative growth rate). Which either the case may be, it is not beneficial to the business owner.
A change in depreciation method is treated as a change in estimate that is achieved by a change in accounting principle, and is accounted for prospectively in the current and future periods.
The rules and regulations that businesses and other organizations must abide by when reporting financial data are known as accounting principles. These regulations standardize the terminology and procedures that accountants must employ, making it simpler to analyze financial data.
A unified set of accounting guidelines, methods, and standards known as generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) were released by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).
The consistency that accounting principles establish enables more accurate and effective viewing of financial statements and reporting for businesses.
Learn more about accounting principles here
brainly.com/question/5399294
#SPJ4
Answer:
The marginal benefit from selling the vane without restoring it is $200.
Explanation:
Marginal benefits are the extra income a company can get from selling one additional unit of production.
Zane had already spent $250 in purchasing the vane and the restoration process.
Zane has two options:
- Sell the vane as it is for $200.
- Keep restoring the vane, spend $200 more and sell the vane for $500.
If Zane decides to sell the vane as it is, his marginal benefit will be $200. That would not be enough to cover his costs, this transaction will result in a $50 loss.
If Zane decides to continue the restoration, then his marginal costs will be $200 extra, but his marginal benefit would be $500. If he chose this option he could end up earning a $50 profit.
