Answer:
$120 billion
Explanation:
Economy operating at $300 billion above its natural level of output.
Marginal propensity to consume, MPC = 3/5 = 0.6
For closing this expansionary gap, the government have to decrease its spending by the amount calculated as follows:
Spending multiplier:
= 1/ (1 - MPC)
= 1/ (1 - 0.6)
= 1/ 0.4
= 2.5
Hence, the government spending reduces by
= Expansionary gap ÷ Spending multiplier
= $300 ÷ 2.5
= $120 billion
Answer:
<u>When making an outline, it is a good practice to:</u>
- Put the main idea in the title
- Have one main topic that does not relate to the title
- Strive for 3-5 major components
- Move single sub point to larger groups
- Allow sub points to overlap.
- Combine sub points whenever possible
Answer:
the free cash flow valuation model can be used to find the value of a division
Answer:
The correct answers are: greater; below
Explanation:
Education is a public good and a human right from which no one should be excluded. To conceive it as a right and not as a service, requires the State to ensure a compulsory and free education to all citizens, because the rights are not bought or traded, UNESCO establishes and defends.
However, the general benefit of education is greater than the sum of benefits that it provides to each individual. In this sense, four positive externalities are identified: (a) Individuals with more education, charge more and pay more taxes. (b) Kangaroo effect: the State from a young age takes care of the children and therefore, the woman can go to work and produce more income. (c) Production externality: an individual with more education will produce more production and therefore more income. (d) Cultural externality: a community with a strong cultural base can contribute to fostering values such as tolerance and increasing social cohesion, contributing to the reduction of social conflict.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.