Answer:
All equity plan:
EPS = $160,000 / 42,000 = $3.81
Plan I:
EPS = [$160,000 - ($108,000 x 7%)] / 39,000 = $152,440 / 39,000 = $3.91
Plan II:
EPS = [$160,000 - ($324,000 x 7%)] / 33,000 = $137,320 / 33,000 = $4.16
Plan II is better since the resulting EPS is higher than the other alternatives.
Answer:
The company WACC is 13.30%
Explanation:
For computing the WACC, first we have to find the weight-age of both debt and equity.
Since in the question, the weightage of debt and equity is given which is equals to
Debt = 30%
And, Equity or common stock = 70%
So, we can easily compute the WACC. The formula is shown below
= Weighted of debt × cost of debt × (1- tax rate) + Weighted of equity × cost of equity
= 0.30 × 0.10 × (1 - 0.30) + 0.70 × 0.16
= 0.021 + 0.112
= 13.30%
Hence, the company WACC is 13.30%
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
Answer:
they use financial statements and other information prepared by accountants to make financial decision and are focused on the cash flows, the inflows and outflows of cash.
Explanation:
Elected governance officials and appointed governance officials
