Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
Over John, the California court has: <u>c. in personam jurisdiction.</u>
Explanation:
In personam jurisdiction means personal jurisdicion:this means the court’s has the authority to determine personal rights and liabilities of the parties before it. This means that the cort has the authority to detemine John's personl rights and also to charge him if necessary.
1. soil characteristics
2. how far away the closest untouched ecosystems are
3. the habitat's remaining species
4. the presence of fungi as soil symbionts
Ecological succession refers to the process of changing in an ecological community's species composition through time. The time frame might span several decades or fewer (for instance, following a wildfire).
The community grows through an increase in complexity from a small number of pioneer plants and animals to a stable or self-sustaining climax community. The effects of established species on their own settings serve as the "engine" of succession and the reason why ecosystems evolve. Living has the effect of changing one's surroundings, sometimes subtly and sometimes blatantly.
To know more about Ecological succession refer to brainly.com/question/23762237
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is a.operant
Explanation:
The operant learning has to do with the learning process in which a behavior is modified by reinforcement or punishment. In this type of learning, the stimuli are presented when a behavior is rewarded or punished come to control that behavior.
