This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.
For every problem-solving activity, it’s crucial that no less than five alternatives be considered.
True or false?
Answer: False
Explanation:
Any problem-solving activity involves problem outlining, defining its causes, determining alternatives for a more suitable resolution, and implementing that solution.
There´s not a minimal amount of alternatives to be considered, as long as all affected people are welcome to propose alternatives, compatible with the institutional purposes, including short- and long-term options.
Remember drama is always going to have a conflict in some way.
C. I took this in English last year
The bandwagon fallacy is in the insistence that good cities are good because they have rail.
Explanation:
The bandwagon fallacy is where the causation of something is confused as an effect.<u> It is the argument that because all the great cities of the country have light rail, our city too should have the same light rail system to be as good as them.</u>
This argument falls apart because the rail will not curb the problems that the passage itself talks about and then willfully ignores. I<u>n fact, bringing the rail to town will actually aggravate some of the issues mentioned here</u>. Which is why the argument becomes more weak.
From my my experience this usually differs depending on the type of book it is, but I think the best choice is either A, to help the reader understand new concepts, or C., It allows the reader to focus on key ideas and information during the reading. I'd pick C though, since it's more in depth and makes more sense.
B. doesn't make that much sense unless the book is an argumentative or a persuasive book.
D. only applies to personal narratives. Nobody can understand a writer's personal experiences and attitudes otherwise.
