Rolle's Theorem does not apply to the function because there are points on the interval (a,b) where f is not differentiable.
Given the function is
and the Rolle's Theorem does not apply to the function.
Rolle's theorem is used to determine if a function is continuous and also differentiable.
The condition for Rolle's theorem to be true as:
- f(a)=f(b)
- f(x) must be continuous in [a,b].
- f(x) must be differentiable in (a,b).
To apply the Rolle’s Theorem we need to have function that is differentiable on the given open interval.
If we look closely at the given function we can see that the first derivative of the given function is:
![\begin{aligned}f(x)&=\sqrt{(2-x^{\frac{2}{3}})^3}\\ f(x)&=(2-x^{\frac{2}{3}})^{\frac{3}{2}}\\ f'(x)&=\frac{3}{2}(2-x^{\frac{2}{3}})^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot \frac{2}{3}\cdot (-x)^{\frac{1}{3}}\\ f'(x)&=\frac{-\sqrt{2-x^{\frac{2}{3}}}}{\sqrt[3]{x}}\end](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7Df%28x%29%26%3D%5Csqrt%7B%282-x%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7D%29%5E3%7D%5C%5C%20f%28x%29%26%3D%282-x%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7D%29%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%7D%5C%5C%20f%27%28x%29%26%3D%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%282-x%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7D%29%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%5Ccdot%20%28-x%29%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%7D%5C%5C%20f%27%28x%29%26%3D%5Cfrac%7B-%5Csqrt%7B2-x%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%7D%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx%7D%7D%5Cend)
From this point of view we can see that the given function is not defined for x=0.
Hence, all the assumptions are not satisfied we can reach a conclusion that we cannot apply the Rolle's Theorem.
Learn more about Rolle's Theorem from here brainly.com/question/12279222
#SPJ4
Answer: x-3, 3, is not equal to
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
10010
Step-by-step explanation:


So
gives us:



-----------------------------------------------------
Combine like terms:


We aren't allowed to have a coefficient bigger than 1.
I'm going to replace
with 1 and
with
:

I want a
number:

Combine like terms:

:

Combine like terms:

We can rewrite the first term by law of exponents:


So the binary form is:

Maybe you like this way more:
Keep in mind 1+1=10 and that 1+1+1=11:
Setup:
1 0 1 1
+ 1 1 1
------------------------------
(1) (1) (1)
1 0 1 1
+ 1 1 1
------------------------------
1 0 0 1 0
I had to do some carry over with my 1+1=10 and 1+1+1=11.
Answer: The height of the building is 50.75 feet.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio between the height of the object and the casted shadow must be equal for all the objects, as the angle at which the source if light impacts them is the same.
For the person, we know that it is 5.8ft tall, and the shadow is 3.2ft long.
The ratio will be: 5.8ft/3.2ft = 1.8125
Now, if H is the height of the building, and the shadow that the building casts is 28ft, we must have:
H/28ft = 1.8125
Now we can solve this for H.
H = 1.8125*28ft = 50.75 ft
Then the height of the building is 50.75 feet.
5/6 times 3/1= 15/6 so that will be your answer