Answer:
Yes the company must recognise the effects of this ruling.
Explanation:
As provided the law suit was initiated in the year 20x2, because of the activity happened in April 20x2.
Accordingly, company was already prepared for a liability of $100,000.
Whenever an event that occurs after the balance sheet is a mere confirmation to what was expected on balance sheet date, or is in alignment with things on record on the balance sheet date, it shall be provided in the balance sheet of that year.
In the given case the law suit was pending on the balance sheet date and was recorded as a liability then, now after the declaration by the judge, the additional liability of $20,000 shall be provided in the financial books of year 20x2.
Answer:
B. Prepaid insurance is shown on the income statement
Explanation:
Prepaid insurance first and foremost is a current asset and as such will not reflect in the income statement but in the statement of Financial Position or Balance Sheet.
Although, prepaid insurance will be shown as paid within the year, it must be deducted from the insurance premium paid for the current year and then reported in the balance sheet as a current asset.
Prepaid insurance is treated as a current asset because it is an indication of insurance premiums paid for by the company in advance. It is a payment for economic benefits that will be enjoyed in the future, therefore it is a current asset. The only part of an insurance premium that shows in the income statement is the insurance expense paid for insurance benefit enjoyed in the current period
Answer:
Option C is correct
Explanation:
This means an increase in actual price would make quantity aggregate supply curve to shift to the right.
Answer:
One company pays 100%, the other re-reimburses 50%
Explanation:
If an environmental assessment found that the two companies share joint and several liability for a hazardous materials cleanup.
What could happen if the two of them don't agree to cooperate in the cleanup is that one of the companies will eventually settle the costs fully while the other party will have to reimburse the party that pays, 50%.
The paying company could make claims because the environmental impact assessment has already found both companies jointly liable. hence each company ought to jointly share the costs
