1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
2 years ago
5

Which of the following groups may be legally restricted from exercising rights generally protected by the Second Amendment?

History
2 answers:
liubo4ka [24]2 years ago
6 0

D. People who have previously been convicted of murder

Sav [38]2 years ago
5 0
Once you have broken the law, specifically causing harm to another individual, you may be denied the right to bear arms, which is give to law-abiding citizens by the Second Amendment. The right to bear arms allows people to have guns, but if you have murdered someone, you're probably going to lose that privilege because you've proved you can't be trusted with weapons.

Answer: D. People who have previously been convicted of murder

Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
PLS HELP I NEED ASAP DUE SOON PLS AND TY ILYSM IF U DO HELP
Masja [62]
I’m not sure sorry hope ya get help
6 0
2 years ago
How do the 3 branches share powers?
stira [4]
Has to be connected
5 0
3 years ago
Which general was one of the first union officials to refuse to return runaway slaves to their masters?
muminat
<span>Benjamin Butler was one of the first officials. He felt that the runaway slaves could be considered "contraband" and, as such, did not have to be returned to their masters. He felt that the Union could keep them and use them as soldiers if they so chose.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
In the early 1900s, African Americans were not the only ones facing discrimination in the south. A case brought against a Jewish
seropon [69]
<span>D) is the only answer choice that makes sense. What does A) have to do with antisemitism? The question itself tells you that Jews were discriminated against, so B) and C) also make no sense.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It would mean a lot to help!!!!
marin [14]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

They were considered slaves so if they disobeyed their “owners” had full right to enact any punishment on them as they liked

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The fall of the Western Roman Empire would have had the MOST impact on which area of this map?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did Columbus take possession of the lands he visited, and how was this done?
    14·2 answers
  • In the United States, which level of government has the highest authority?
    12·2 answers
  • Which term means "to set aside"?<br> A annul<br> B recant<br> С indulgence<br> D excommunicate
    8·2 answers
  • What was the most important institution in African American communities after the civil war?(apex)
    13·2 answers
  • A direct result of United States involvement in world war 2 was
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following best summarizes the above passage?
    5·1 answer
  • How Muhammad became both a spiritual and a political leader of Arabia?
    14·1 answer
  • America had many factors that helped start the Industrial Revolution. Which of the following is NOT one of them?
    7·1 answer
  • What were john adams strengths and weaknesses as a president
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!