I say the answer is omn third person view
Answer:
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. ... Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources.
Explanation:
Wikipedia is ideal in these situations because it will allow you to find the information, as well as sources which you can research to confirm that information. In any case, you should not cite Wikipedia itself, but the source provided; you should certainly look up the source yourself before citing it.
Why is Wikipedia a good place to begin?
While the wisdom of the crowd doesn't always rule when it comes to objective, fact-based research and writing (unless you're writing a report on Wookies), Wikipedia offers a good way to get your head around a topic and to start narrowing down your research focus so that you can switch to using more commonly accepted .\
A. <em>Tahereh Saffarzadeh's authorial point of view would be different if she had been born in the United States.</em> Being born in Israel and having lived in Iran for years before leaving to England and then to the United States, her vision about Persian culture and Islamic religion is no doubt different from that of a U.S. born citizen. Those societal aspects must be ingrained within her education and formation, making her point of view of the subject more personal and perhaps less conflicted than it would be if her was born in the U.S. (the relations between both cultures being so conflicted for sure have an influence on the citizens of both places and cultures).
Answer:
1. Escort / accompany / help / assist / lead.
2. apocalypse / anti-utopia / h*ll / neverland.
