Answer:
A. If a drug found in drinking water is not a significant public health hazard, then its presence in the water will not have any discernible health effects.
Explanation:
The researchers' maintained a point of view that, the low levels of the drugs found in the water poses no significant threat to public health.
Therefore their reasoning would be most strengthened by the answer "A" chosen above because it implies that;
low levels of the drugs have been present in water over time, and yet, no health effects have been detected previously. Therefore, even if the technology to detect such low levels of the drugs is now available, it shouldn't change the fact that such levels of the drug is still not a significant health hazard.
The answer is A commission plan
The effect of the civil rights decision of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren is very successful. Chief Warren had a good argument. The Brown decision written by him was supported by all the nine chief justices. That is the correct answer to your question. I hope this answer helped you.
