The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Hedonists such as Epicurus and Mill have claimed that pleasure is the only thing worth pursuing its own sake. If some people would choose not to plug into the experience machine, does this show that hedonism is false?
No, what it means is that under the belief system and consideration of that individual, hedonism is not the way to receive pleasure and there would other activities or satisfactions that would report pleasure in doing them. Diversity in people's character and beliefs makes life more rich and interesting in that the search for pleasure has different ways, according to the satisfactoriness, values, and goals of each individual.
Although Hedonists such as Epicurus and Mill have claimed that pleasure is the only thing worth pursuing its own sake, other thinkers and philosophers considered that pleasure is the final result of getting accomplished that what made us thrive under different -and sometimes- difficult circumstances.
So pleasure, fr the sake of the pleasure it is not the only way to approach this.
<span>Wright Mills claimed that the sociological imagination transformed the way that we process certain information, to then turn it in to our own bright and new idea. These new perspectives can then be derived from this idea, to then form an entirely new one.</span>
Making body pillows with intigrated fleshlights turned them into a Feudal system of goverment
Jonas sees that his group mates and his family have the emotional maturity of children. Jonas is experiencing pain, joy, and passion. His friends and family<span> operate on a much lower emotional level. Jonas cannot relate to them anymore. </span>
