Answer:
The correct answer would be, Jose is using the Indirect Paragraph plan.
Explanation:
In the Indirect Paragraph Plan, the writer does not directly writes down the purpose or the plan, rather he gradually builds up to the purpose which he states in the body. The evidence, supporting documentation, reasoning, etc are given in the first place of the message, then writer writes the main idea or purpose of the letter or message or writing.
If you think that the reader to whom you are sending the message would likely to have a negative opinion on your writing, then indirect paragraph plan is the best way to approach him.
As in this case, Jose is not sure about the opinion or reaction of the Dean, so he started his message with the evidence, documentation and reasoning and then told his main purpose.
Waves hit the coast at an angle and form currents in the surf zone
Answer:
I believe it is A, B, and E. Hope this helps! :)
Explanation:
This is the hierarcy of a combination of concepts: social status, economics, privilege, and being a minority or majority. Politics is the science of how human social status and the degree of wealth a person has can affect the life they live. Politicians are meant to represent the people. They are citizens just like us with different family backgrounds but they have the privilege of being leaders. This means they often decide who gets what when and how.
Please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
