1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksenya-84 [330]
3 years ago
15

In one study, it was found that the correlation coefficient between two variables is -0.93.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Fynjy0 [20]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: D. There is a strong negative association between the variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that when the value of the correlation coefficient lies between -1 to -.05 , then we say there is strong negative correlation between the variables.

OR

When the value of the correlation coefficient lies between 0.5 to 1, then we say there is strong positive correlation between the variables.

Given : In one study, it was found that the correlation coefficient between two variables is -0.93.

∵ -1< -0.93 <-0.5

Then , it  indicates that there is a strong negative association between the variables.

Marysya12 [62]3 years ago
4 0

the answer is d (i think) because anything aboveboard .90, whether it is positive or negative

You might be interested in
Is 2/3 greater than 10/18
SVEN [57.7K]
2/3 is greater than 10/18
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At first a price was decreased by 12%, then it was discounted again by an additional 5%. What is the percent of the total discou
olga_2 [115]
Hello there! I can help you! So we are decreasing a price by 12% and then doing it again by 5%. We would pay 88% of the original price and then 95% of that sale price. To execute this better, let's make a real-world situation. Say that Mariana wants to buy a new pair of shoes that originally costed $100. The store has a tag for 12% off and then an additional 5% discount at the counter. How much would she pay for the shoes? What total discount does she get? Let's start by multiplying 100 by 88%. 100 * 88% (0.88) is 88. That's the first part. Now, we multiply that number by 95% to find the price at the counter. 88 * 95% (0.95) is 83.6. That's the price with both discounts. Mariana would pay $83.60 for the shoes, but what about the percent discount total? Let's subtract that price from 100 and see what we get. 100 - 83.6 is 16.4. Percents are parts of 100, so we don't need to do anymore simplifying. There. The total amount of discount is 16.4%.
4 0
3 years ago
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7Bg%7D%7B3%7D%20%20%2B%207%20%3D%2019" id="TexFormula1" title=" \frac{g}{3} + 7 =
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

g = 36

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the equation \frac{g}{3} + 7 =19

Subtract 7 from both sides: \frac{g}{3} = 19 - 7 = 12

\frac{g}{3} = 12

Now, multiply by 3 to both sides: 3 × \frac{g}{3} = 3 × 12

g = 36

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A bag contains 56 marbles: 7 red, 8 green, 11 yellow, 17 brown, and 13 blue.
Neko [114]
Salutations!

<span>A bag contains 56 marbles: 7 red, 8 green, 11 yellow, 17 brown, and 13 blue.

If a marble is chosen at random, what is the probability that the marble is green?

Probability means an occurrence of a chance

(Probability of getting green marble) = </span>8/56

Simplify tex]8/56[/tex]

The simplified answer would be 1/7

Hope I helped (:

Have a great day!
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
during the weekend Michael took 6 and 3/7 hours to do his homework, 4.37 hours to clean his room and then walked his dog for 2/3
alukav5142 [94]

We conclude that Michael worked for a total of 11.46 hours in the weekend.

<h3>How much time did he work on the weekend?</h3>

We know that during the weekend, the times that he used for each task are:

  • (6 + 3/7) hours to do his homework.
  • 4.37 hours to clean his room.
  • 2/3 hours to walk the dog

The total time is given by the sum between the above numbers, where the difficulty is the fact that the 3 numbers are in different notations (decimal, fraction, and mixed).

The sum is:

S = (6 + 3/7) h + 4.37 h + 2/3 h

The easier way to do this, is to write the 3 numbers in decimal form:

2/3 = 0.66

6 + 3/7 = 6 + 0.43 = 6.43

Then the total time is:

S = 6.43 h + 4.37h + 0.66h = 11.46 h

We conclude that Michael worked for a total of 11.46 hours in the weekend.

If you want to learn more about sums:

brainly.com/question/17695139

#SPJ1

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • 15 decreased by twice a number x in algebriac expression
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!
    12·1 answer
  • An automotive repair center charges $45 for any part of the first hour of labor, and $25 for any part of each additional hour. W
    15·1 answer
  • 1010,0101,1100,0011,11100............what is next ?
    12·2 answers
  • Very confused &amp; don't understand, if anyone can explain I appreciate it!
    13·2 answers
  • Points Pand Q lie in plane A. How many lines contain P
    5·1 answer
  • Help pls just need the answer... pls and thank you
    14·1 answer
  • Cual es el resultado de la siguiente expresión aritmética?(-3) (1/8)+(-2.5)
    14·1 answer
  • Does anyone ply Pokémon go ?
    6·2 answers
  • Again I need help, If you tell me the answer that would be very nice! ,
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!