This statement is true. As there is the growing emphasis on the strategic supply management processes and less on the purchase transactions.
Effective interpretation of corporate and supplier objectives, selection of appropriate actions to achieve objectives and integration of inventory information into organizational strategies. hiring professionals trained specifically in supply management, providing them with technical knowledge and long-term leadership development. emphasizing strategic cost management, engaging key suppliers early in the process, and measuring reductions in total cost of ownership. Supply management has evolved from a process-oriented, strategic function to a transactional, tactical function. The reduction in inventory investment comes primarily from users reducing their demand for stocked items. Therefore the statement is true.
Learn more about supply management.
brainly.com/question/25843620
#SPJ4
Answer:
Wages of solar panel installers increase in another town and attract workers away from Billy's town.
Explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
Cedrick's potential maximum liability = $50
Explanation:
Given:
$250 = a Blueminusray player
$600 = new set of tires
$200 = Cash withdrawal
$40 = interest charges
Find:
Cedrick's potential maximum liability
Computation:
Cedrick's potential maximum liability = Blueminusray player - Cash withdrawal
Cedrick's potential maximum liability = $250 - $200
Cedrick's potential maximum liability = $50
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
