Answer:
Articles 1, 2, and 3 of the Constitution describe the different branches of government, but there is no real quote about the separation of powers as a concept or doctrine.
Explanation:
There isn't really just one quote in the US Constitution that reflects the whole notion of the separation of powers between the three branches as the first three articles of the constitution each establish the importance of the separate branches and their relation to each other. The concept of separation of powers is thus inherent in the structure of government itself, but it is not really singled out as a concept or mentioned in and of itself. The legislative, executive, and judiciary levels are described in the First Article, in the Second Article, and in the Third Article. The concept of separation of powers is attributed to Montesquieu and James Madison wanted to include an explicit statement on the separation of powers in the Bill of Rights, but it was rejected in the revisions and suggestions made by the other Framers. It therefore remains an idea that is implicit in the government structures described in the Constitution.
Answer: Friedrich Hayek’s work The Road to Serfdom argued that centralized Economic Planning ultimately threatened liberty. Conservatives used this book to justify a reduced role for the state in the economy, by equating fascism and socialism with the New Deal.
Explanation: Frederick Hayek in his book <em>The Road to Serfdom</em>, published in 1944, criticized government involvement in the market seeing it as a system that leads to loss of individual freedom.
Centralized Economic planning is key to socialism as a method to ensure equality, but Hayek argued that central planning forces the will of a few people on the public. This is not socialism but dictatorship.
Conservatives, who favored a reduced government role in economic planning quoted this book and equated the New deal with fascism. The New Deal was a program designed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to revive the economy after the Great Depression.
Not too long just like about 2 months
Answer:
The desire for a new Constitution was borne out of some of the lapses of the Articles of Confederation which produced a weak central government. In 1787, representatives from 12 states from the existing 13 states in the United States converged to draft the new U.S Constitution. Several deliberations were made to form a better and stronger system of government. However, two alliances were formed at that time as a faction. One was the Federalists and the other was the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. They wanted a sizable amount of representation in government among states based on their population.
During the process of ratifying the Constitution, the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights need not be part of the Constitution. They believed that with the addition of the Bill of Rights, the rights of citizens would be affected negatively and less protected.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, wanted the same representation in all states. This alliance was led by Patrick Henry. They argued for the Bill of Rights and was against every move to establish a new Constitution, on the ground that, the constitution will give more powers to the National government and this will be detrimental to the citizens' rights.
A compromise was agreed on and after much debate on the issues of the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was submitted to the Congress of Federation in 1787 and by 1788, it had been ratified by most states.
<h3>Answer:</h3><h2><u><em>The decision to give up visiting popular Ouro Preto.</em></u></h2><h3>Explanation:</h3>
Opportunity cost is the profit lost when one choice is chosen over different. The idea is valuable only as a suggestion to consider all logical choices before making a judgment. If economists regard to the “opportunity cost” of a support, they indicate the importance of the next-highest-valued alternative use of that support.
