Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
He was unable to resist the demands
of his id.
Answer:
Uncertain - 99%.
Explanation:
Predicting or forecasting the future could be measured with a sense of certainty or uncertainty. If a person sees dark clouds on the sky, they would be more certain than uncertain that it's an omen of rain. If you are collecting relevant data and then apply it to a forecast having less than 1% of certainty of reducing the degree of risk, conditions are uncertain. And, if measured from 1% to 100%, substracting that 1% of certainty leaves a 99& of uncertainty.
Yes. The National Center for Education Statistics publishes the Public high school 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate.
What is the adjusted cohort graduation rate?
- The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate (ACGR) refers to the number of students who graduate from high school in four years with a regular high school diploma divided by the number of students who form the adjusted cohort for the graduating class.
- The Public high school 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate is described in the form of a table which can describe the data easily.
- The data can be obtained for the national as well as the state level for the fifty states.
- The Public high school 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate can also be obtained by race/ ethnicity.
- It is used as an indicator.
- It is published by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
- In the year 2018-2019 the national adjusted cohort graduation rate was 86 percent, which is the highest since the rate was first measured in 2010-2011.
To learn more about National Center for Education Statistics, refer: brainly.com/question/10404402
#SPJ4
