Answer:
- <u><em>D. It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Of course, ethics mandates that the target of science and <em>new technology </em>should always pursue the good for humans; nevertheless, since time immemorial man has developed technology to make war. Thus, definetely, the first statement <em>"A It always does good for human"</em> is false.
Some other negative effects of <em>new technology</em>, like cars and nuclear power, have been harmful to the environment, but you cannot tell that this has always been so. Technology has also been developed to help the environment. For instance, panels to use solar energy do not harm the environment and seek to reduce fuel burning to help the environment. Thus, option <em>B, "It always ends up doing harm to the environment"</em> is false too.
Some of the damage that new technology can produce are not predicted both because the technology is new and because it may be used with different goals to those it was developed. This explains why option <em>C, It has many bad effects</em>, is false, and option <em>D, "It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are", </em>is true.
Answer:
management has not explained its business purpose
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the firm is engaged in the new financial transaction that contains the material impact on the earnings so this represents that it could be come under the pre existed accounting standards.
Also everyone should be aware of the business purpose plus it is not established for changing off the financial statements
So it would be suspicious because the purpose of the business could not be explained
The new ordinance will make a difference when the new wages will be binding.
<h3>How to depict the information?</h3>
It should be noted that the supply curve shows the relationship between the price and the quantity supplied.
Based on the information given, when the equilibrium wage is above the minimum wage, the ordinance won't make a difference.
On the other hand, when the equilibrium wage is below the minimum wage, it'll make a difference for the worker.
Therefore, joining the lowest of the two points will give the equilibrium.
Learn more about supply curve on:
brainly.com/question/26430220
#SPJ11
Answer: The two dimensions of the competing values framework are the internal focus and imagination and the flexibility and discretion.
Explanation: There are 2 dimensions but 4 models within the competing values framework. The reason this model is called the competing models framework is because each model conflicts the message of another. These framework models do not agree and often times compete for what the best option to make is.
