The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
The answer would be a because many of the gold diggers actually didn't find gold. hope this helped :3
Answer: C
Explanation:
When the Capulets fail to consult Juliet, tension begins to build in her family.
Brutus' tragic flaw of idealism contributes to his downfall because he was gullible enough to be convinced by Cassius and Antony that they were going to murder Julius Caesar for Rome's development and goodwill. He was blinded by that idealism and believed that these were their true intentions for inviting him in the murder, thus, making him involved greatly and made him feel guilty - leading him to suicide.
Answer:
This question is incomplete, since you did not provide the planning pages and rough draft that you have learned. Anyway, I will give you an answer that will be useful for this question.
Explanation:
Once a spending budget is established, you can get an idea of the total income that is needed to maintain or grow your money. This information is essential for formulating effective goals and plans.
Without spending budgets, you run the risk of overspending, reducing or eliminating profit margins.
The budget should be evaluated periodically in relation to a person's actual finances, to ensure alignment exists and to help identify potential spending problems, cash flow gaps, savings opportunities, or future profit scenarios.
Budget planning and tracking will help identify unnecessary expenses, adapt quickly to changes in financial situation, and also achieve financial goals.
