Answer:
a win-win solution
Explanation:
In simple words, A win-win agreement or solution can be understood as a close examination of both your own as well as your opponent's positions in order to reach a mutually satisfactory conclusion that offers you both as much as practicable. That will be considered a win scenario if both of you are satisfied with the outcome of the transaction.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the given case illustrates the lack of win win solution.
Hello there,
What group declared war on Ghana?
Answer: Almoravids
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
One of France's greatest natural resources is its deep veins of coal used to generate 90% of France's electricity. The discovery and implementation of coal in France is what helped them enter the Industrial Revolution in the mid-19th century. It also played a hugely important role in during World War 1 and helped propel France towards becoming a "superpower" during the War. This was largely due to their increased production that was possible due to their vast coal resource.
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
Answer:
charles cornwallis po, letter c
Explanation:
hope it helps
