Answer:
The hammer, anvil, and stirrup in Tina's ears were not performing their functions.
Explanation:
Tina was born with a hearing deficiency.
The hammer, anvil and stirrup are collectively called as middle ear ossicles. Hammer is also known as malleus. Another name of anvil is incus and stirrup is stapes.
They are located at the middle ear between the cochlea and the eardrum.
When a sound hits the surface of the ear drum, it vibrates. It makes the middle ear ossicles to motions. One end of hammer is attached to the eardrum while the other end is connected to the anvil. The anvil is then connected with the stirrup.
All these three units sends the sound signal to the inner ear.
Thus Dr. Albert while treating Tina concluded that ---
The hammer, anvil, and stirrup in Tina's ears were not performing their functions.
Answer:
B) B. F. Skinner.
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing, the options are:
A) Albert Bandura.
B) B. F. Skinner.
C) Ivan Pavlov.
D) John Garcia.
E) John B. Watson.
In psychology, Operant conditioning is a method of learning that occurs through rewards (that increase the probability for one behavior to take place) and punishments (that decrease the probability for one behavior to take place).
Operant conditioning appeared after classical conditioning, since psychologists started to think that classical conditioning was too simple when explaining behaviors. The most famous psychologist who is associated with operant conditioning was B. F. Skinner and he is considered the father of operant conditioning.
Answer:
Explanation:
They were the responsibility of their families.
plz mark as brainliest
Answer: 1. Roosevelts statement on immigrants was considered vastly progressive for the time, as people had been discriminating against people based on birthplace for years. That wasn't the kind of change in people you would expect to see overnight, but he pushed for it anyway.
2. I feel like this statement is very much valid, if not underperforming. It doesn't matter where you come from, or what your country of origin was like, all that matters is you're here not and how you act now. Not hiring somebody because of where they are from will only windup as a huge loss for your business,
Answer: This isn't really understood, because not all societies formed governments in the sense of western hierarchical systems, and not all governments formed under the same conditions. It is one of those mysteries, which means it was a gradual thing, and not a sudden seasonal change from anarchy to government. The first government accumulated within a group of people who spoke the same language, and there was some pressure on them that required some level of organization for the distribution of resources and labor, so it seems, but even as I write this I know that is far too simple.
For thousands of years it was believed there was a natural hegemony bestowed by divine power, then, there was the American Revolution and the idea of government was turned upside down. Following that was Karl Marx, who suggested that government was a mechanism of oppression to control the means of production and wealth accumulation, but all of the hypotheses built from this idea, which most of modern thinking can find some degree of lineage to, are problematic to be nice, and outright failures at the other extreme.
Quick answer is, there are a thousand answers, none of which have proven to be universal, so they are only partially right.
There is a lot of room for research in this area.
