Answer:
-$210,000
Explanation:
Issued Common Stock at par for Cash $250,000
Less:
Declared and paid a cash dividend $20,000
Repayment of 6-year note payable $440,000
Net Cash provided by Financing Activities ($210,000)
Answer:
c. is valid and enforceable
Explanation:
In business, this is called a Non-Compete Clause.
Non-Compete Clause can prevent a certain individual or organization to compete with another business , as long as both parties con sensually sign the agreement.
Typically, Non-Compete clause is required after all the parties involved have some sort of affiliation toward one another/
<u>for example:</u>
1. One party just bought the business from another party.
2. One party is an ex-members/ex-employees of another party. Making them know internal secrets of that other party.
Answer:
D. Will the Jury award be worth it?
Explanation:
Jones asking himself if whistle blowing is the only way to stop unethical behavior and wrong doing before making decision whether or not to whistleblow is important, as if there are alternative measures to be taken that would mitigate those actions, it might be better to take those alternatives.
Same thing with whether he has documentary evidence to back up his accusatory statements and the reason for whistleblowing.
But the one thing that shouldn't have bearing on his decision is if the Jury award would be worth it. Whether or not there's an award for whistleblowing shouldn't be the determinant or driving factor that decides whether or not he should whistleblow. Its unethical to consider the monetary aspect or award gotten from whistleblowing.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
