In "The Petition of William Cobbett" in volume 33 of his political register, the author clearly refers to King James as "The Oppressor", who has raised money on arbitrary means and is not administering in a way it benefits the citizens of the kingdom. It is mentioned that King James raised the money in order to fund affairs regarding "army, navy and civil listing".
<span>Tribal Council was dominated by male speakers, but the women decided which men should be speakers. If the chosen man expressed opinions that clashed with those of the Womens’ Council, they could replace him with someone who more closely represented their views. If the Tribal Council took a course of action that the women disagreed with, such as a raid, the women might simply refuse to give them any food for the journey.</span>
Answer:
Freedom needs to be balanced by respect of the law.
Answer:
The various consequences of the Wars of the Roses may be summarised as: an increase in the power of nobles compared to the Crown during the wars. an increase in the use of violence and assassination as political tools. the destruction of half the nobility of England.
Explanation:
Well, this could be interpreted in a general view. A good way I've found to understand history especially is to almost interprete right now. I know this is not the answer but it is helpful. How can different view cause conflict? Simple you want to fight for your views because you believe they are right.
