The economist's analysis in the scenario painted above incorporates the idea of OPPORTUNITY COST.
Opportunity cost refers to a value or a benefit which must be given up in order to enjoy or acquire another benefit. Because resources are scarce, one always has to make decision about how to use one's resources efficiently. In the scenario given above, Joe had the opportunity to put his money in a fixed deposit account or to use it to buy gold coins; he choose the latter given up the former. Thus, the former, which he gave up is his opportunity cost.<span />
Answer:
$42
Explanation:
APR = 18% , month rate = 18%/12 = 1.5%
Fee for cash advance = 2%
Cash advance of the first day of month = $1,200
Finance charge = Cash advance * (Monthly rate + Advance cash fee)
Finance charge = $1,200*1.5% + $1,200*2%
Finance charge = $18 + $24
Finance charge = $42
So, the approximate total finance charge i will pay on this cash advance for the month is $42
Answer: Work breakdown structure.
Explanation:
A work breakdown structure is as the name implies a breakdown of the stages of work involved in successfully completing a greater objective/project. The work breakdown structure is drafted out and gives member of a team direction on the steps needed to achieving their desired objectives.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Capital gains and losses netting will have no effect on tax payable. The individual impact on tax will be same as of netting the gains and losses. The net outcome of the tax will be remain un impacted.
Answer:
A. the double coincidence of wants problem.
Explanation:
Trade by barter involves the exchange of goods and services for goods and services without the use of money as a medium of exchange. In barter system, there is what we call double coincidence of wants. This is the economic situation whereby both parties holds what the other wants to buy, so they exchange the goods directly. Here, both parties agrees to buy and sell each other commodities. However, if one of the party is not interested in what the other party is offering, it causes a disruption in the trade. This disruption refers to a drawback in the system like the example described in the question.
Here, Andy couldn't make a deal with Danny even tho he wants what Danny is offering. This is because what Danny isn't interested in what Andy is offering. Thus, the double coincidence of want and barter trade can't occur between the two parties.
