Answer:
center-to-outward
Explanation:
The proximodistal trend can be described as the direction of motor development center-to-outward.
It is the development of of the general functions of the limbs before developing more refined and controlled motor skills. It is associated to the developmental l psychology branch of science. it further describes it as the center to outward function.
I hope the answer is helpful.
Thanks for asking.
Classical conditioning applies to <u>voluntary behavior</u>, while operant conditioning applies to <u>involuntary </u><u>behavior</u>.
Classical conditioning links an automatic or voluntary response to a stimulus. Operant conditioning includes incentives as well as rewards for the learner, whereas classical conditioning does not.
Unconscious learning occurs during classical conditioning. When you learn through classical conditioning, a predetermined stimulus is matched with an instinctive conditioned response. Thus, a behaviour is produced.
Operant conditioning is a form of associative learning in which the strength of a behaviour is altered by reward or punishment. It is also a method that is employed to facilitate such learning.
To learn more about Classical conditioning, refer
brainly.com/question/12691454
#SPJ4
Answer:
Correlational research design
Explanation:
Correlational research design is one that is established to show a close relationship between two variables or two sample groups. In this type of research design it is necessary to evaluate two different groups from the same sample of individuals, these groups will be evaluated by a different variable in each one showing the relationship that this variable has in each group and the relationships between the results presented.
Answer:
The answer is C or D but C has more of what happened so i would pick C
Explanation:
Answer:
This chapter provides a historical framework for consideration of today’s debates over privatization. Changes in policies and practices are never free of the inertia of history. Some of the key pressures for change today have resulted from past action (or inaction), and today’s practices have evolved from specific problem-solving histories.
Efforts to provide safe drinking water and wastewater disposal facilities date back to the origins of civilization (Rosen, 1993; Winslow, 1952). Ancient societies in Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, Pakistan, Crete, and Greece all sought to provide safe drinking water and safe means of human waste disposal. Water supply and wastewater collection reached a high point in the Roman Empire. The Dark Ages, however, witnessed a decline in the development and application of these practices.
As world population neared one billion during the Industrial Revolution in the late nineteenth century, cities and villages became more crowded. Public health concerns dictated that new ways had to be found to provide safe water supplies as well as provide means for safe disposal of sanitary wastes. Growth in the numbers and in the size of cities and increasing use of water in residential, commercial, and industrial enterprises led to increasing provision of public systems for water supply and wastewater systems. Although some research suggests that private water companies emerged during the Renaissance (Walker, 1968), private entrepreneurs initiated the provision of water supply services on a large scale during the nineteenth century in both Europe and the United States. By contrast, provision of sewers, along with streets and drainage facilities,
Explanation:
