Answer:
0.4
Explanation:
This problem has been solved using the method of integration.
We are required to solve for the probability that it takes Robby between 29 and 39 minutes to go grocery shopping
= X~U(20,45)
= 1/45-20
= 1/25
Then we get computation for p[29<x<39]
When we take the integrals with x = 1/25
We get
Probability that it takes Robby between 29 and 39 minutes to go shopping to be 0.4
Answer:
a. 4.94%
b. 11.48%
Explanation:
Here in this question, we are interested in calculating the pretax cost of debt and cost of equity.
We proceed as follows;
a. From the question;
The debt equity ratio = 1.15
since Equity = 1 ; Then
Total debt + Total equity = 1 + 1.15 = 2.15
Mathematically ;
WACC = Cost of equity x Weight of equity + Pretax Cost of debt x Weight of debt x (1-Tax rate)
Where WACC = 8.6%
Cost of equity = 14%
Weight of equity = 1/(total debt + total equity) = 1/(1+1.15) = 1/2.15
Pretax cost of debt = ?
Weight of debt = debt equity ratio/total cost of debt = 1.15/2.15
Tax rate = 21% = 0.21
Substituting these values, we have;
8.6% = 14% x 1/2.15 + Pretax cost of debt x 1.15/2.15 x (1-21%)
8.6% = 14% x 1/2.15 + Pretax cost of debt x 1.15/2.15 x (1-21%)
Pretax cost debt = (8.6%-6.511628%)/(1.15/2.15 x (1-21%))
Pretax cost of debt = 4.94%
b. WACC = Cost of equity x Weight of equity + After tax Cost of debt x Weight of debt
8.6% = Cost of equity x 1/2.15 + 6.1% x 1.15/2.15
Cost of equity = (8.6%-3.26279%)/(1/2.15)
Cost of equity = 11.48%
The what-if analysis tool would be the most adequate choice for intricate calculations that need contrived optimization:
b). Scenario manager
- 'What-if analysis tool' is described as the tools that are employed to alter the values present in the cells.
- It is done to observe the effect of changing the values impact the results produced by the used formula.
- The what-if analysis tools have been categorized into three distinct types:
- a). Scenarios.
- b). Goal Seek.
- c). Data Tables.
- As per the question, in order to opt for complex calculations, 'Scenarios' what-if analysis would be most adequate as they examine a number of variables and set of numbers/values that affect the outcome.
Thus, <u>option b</u> is the correct answer.
Learn more about 'what-if tool' here:
brainly.com/question/14830872
Answer:
Supplier dependence
Explanation:
When an entity finds itself in a situation where it has to rely on a particular supplier or provider of service for its business operations, either as a result of not being able to get an alternative supplier or the importance of the suppliers product to the entity, such is called supplier dependence.
It is very risky for an entity to depend on a particular source for input. This reverse order of an entity depending on the supplier for business strategy instead of the supplier depending on the entity is not a good business practice.
It’s easy for our own strategy to be determined by what our suppliers are doing. If we become too dependent, we risk having our strategy set by our suppliers rather than having them support our strategy. I’ve been thinking a lot here recently about how much suppliers can direct you
Answer:
The answer is "400 meals at 2.50 dollars a day".
Explanation:
Please find the complete question and the solution in the attachment file.
In this question, when we compare the MR value as well as the MC, the monopolist produces up to the point where MR>MC.
In this, it happens before 400 meals at 2.50 per day and, so "400 meal at 2.50 dollars a day".
