Julia is engaged in the stage of the perception process known as interpreting, where she tries to make sense of her experiences and their meaning.
<h3>The interpretation stage</h3>
When it comes to the perception process, the interpretation stage is the moment where we make sense of the world and the experiences we have had in it. This is where we try to see a meaning in what we have lived through.
This is what Julia is doing. She is analyzing her past personal experiences, her involvement with people in the present and even the assumptions she has, all with the purpose of understanding her situation. Julia is interpreting, making sense of her life and situation.
With the information above in mind, we can choose the third answer choice as the correct answer for this question.
The complete question with the missing answer choices is the following:
In an attempt to understand the situation unfolding around her, Julia considered past personal experiences, her involvement with others present, and any assumptions she might have. In doing so, what stage of the perception process was she engaged in?
Learn more about the perception process here:
brainly.com/question/1838569
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. The words one and sun rhyme
A clerk at ellis island would be the definition in this picture
Michael would argue that Ramses the Second died of causes that are not to be known as it is impossible to figure them out.
Explanation:
Bruno Latour is known for his work in the studies in the filed of science and technology studies. However, his study of the practice of science was indeed at one time associated with the post truth and social constructionist movements and approaches.
Michael to take a constructionist stance would be to assume that it is impossible for such a statement to be made regarding an ancient King on the basis of meager evidence for his tuberculosis.
So he would insist that it cannot be known how he died.
Answer:
Your answer is correct. Differential association theory.
Explanation:
Differential association theory was proposed by sociologist Edwin Sutherland. It is a deviance theory that claims individuals learn criminal behaviors. According to this theory, values, motives, and even techniques for criminal behaviors are learned through interacting with others. However, it has been criticized for failing to take into consideration personality traits that may also influence people's behaviors.
