Answer:
you gotta sho me the options
Explanation:
Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government.
Locke quarreled for the belief that the individuals are conclusively the reference of powers in supervising, Thus the individual also has the freedom to dismount a party that is not suitably accepting the nation's people. John Locke was discussing the concept of a "social contract." According to his opinion, a government's capability to administer by the permission of the people. This was a transition from the unfounded beliefs of "divine right monarchy" that a king governed because Lord designated him to be the leader. Locke discarded the acceptance of the spiritual right government in his First Treatise on Civil Government. In his Second Treatise on Civil Government, Locke contended for the benefits of the people to organize their ministries according to their wishes and to protect their personal life, education, and resources.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
Answer:
The man will forget how to build a fire
A person<span> who always has clean clothes and who is always well-groomed or is always organized is an example of a </span>neat person<span>.</span>
