Answer:
benefits; costs
Explanation:
The theory of social exchange proposes that all relationships are formed, maintained, or broken due to a cost-benefit analysis. It leads us to make comparisons of alternatives raised and, finally, to opt for those relationships that offer us a greater benefit at a lower cost.
This theory has been highly valued among behaviorist paradigms in that it can be quantified and measured for its simplicity. Over time, and with the emergence of cognitive and constructivist paradigms, it became obsolete.
Answer:
— Participation in the development of new rules and principles of international trade. ...
— Export diversification. ...
— Transparent, predictable and attractive investment regime. ...
— Increase of sovereign credit ratings. ...
— Strengthening positions in trade disputes.
hope this will help you if then make me brainliest please ❤️
Answer:
Louder music corresponds to more beer consumption. But this doesn't provide evidence that louder music can causes people to drink more beer.
Explanation:
The louder music does not cause people to drink more beer. There is a spurious correlation between drinking beer and Loud music because of the presence of confounding variable Social which is the interaction in the bar. The people at the bar are not able to talk to each other more because of the presence of loud noise or music. So, they are forced to drink beer more rather than talking during their stay at the bar.
Answer:
C, There should be a budget surplus
Explanation:
A budget surplus happens when there is more money coming in than going out. It can be due to increased taxes, a healthy economy growth or the effectiveness of government.
The surplus is usually spent on investments, improvements, or to pay off any outstanding debts.
When expenditures exceed income, the opposite of a surplus happens, which is known as a budget deficit.
A budget surplus in an indicator of a healthy economy.
Answer: Steve is experiencing evaluation apprehension
Explanation: Since Steve was playing for his high school team for the first time, he knew that others would be watching and evaluating his game, and among those watching him were coaches, therefore, on whom his future playing on the team depends. Based on the coach's judgement, it depends on whether Steve will play the next game, etc., which means a reward / penalty concept based on what others think of Steve. This means that during the game, Steve has been thinking about what others think of him that causes arousal, and that arousal can improve or diminish our work, in Steve's case was that this excitement diminished his performance in the match.
It means that when we work in the presence of others who are watching over us, we think like Steve, what do they think about our work and that can improve or diminish our performance, so we have experienced <em>evaluation apprehension.</em>