1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natta225 [31]
3 years ago
14

Write an essay on Marx’s and Weber’s approaches to social stratification. In a paragraph for each theory, elaborate on the key p

oints. For Weber, be sure to thoroughly discuss the three dimensions of social class discussed in the lecture. Moreover, please clearly discuss the two main differences between Weber’s theory and that of Marx.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Serhud [2]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.

Explanation:

For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.

Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.

Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.

You might be interested in
Choose the correct answer(A, B, C or D)<br><br> a. Sarons b. Gambang c. gongs d. Kendang
Snezhnost [94]

Answer: B

Explanation: Now promise me that you will give me Brainllest

7 0
3 years ago
What mathematical advancement is credited to the Gupta Empire?
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Abe decides that he is too busy to show up for jury duty. This behavior is one which neglects basic
ANEK [815]
The answer is A
political duty i hope thats right 
if it is good for you
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
8 x 4 = (A x 7) - (A x3)<br> ​
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Just so you understand more deeply.  There is more than one answer for this question, "as it is written".  Math can be like this sometimes.  And it can cause a lot of confusion.  You must read it very carefully.  If you multiply 8 x 4 you get 32.  You know that (? x 7) must be greater that that number because you subtract (? x 3).  If you multiply 5 x 7 you get 35.  And that is greater than 32.  Then take 32 from 35 to get 3.  So that (5 x 7) - (1 x 3) also gives 32.  If ? is assumed to be the same value for both (? x 7) and (? x 3).  Then the problem can be solved by the rules of algebra, as it was done by Vivian.  Any other analysis can give you other possible answers.  If this is the case, then there must be some more to the question.  You are not told that ? = ?.  But this must be the case.  And ? is an "operator", not just a question mark.  To get just one answer, they must both be 8.  You just use the "math rules" to move things around until you find the way to the answer.  Scientists sometimes do this for months or years to solve complicated problems.

Often, your number sense gets confused by this kind of "discrepancy" or not knowing where to start situation, when you go beyond simple math and into algebra concepts.  And this can leave you lost and not knowing where to start.  If the general question is put to you to solve the problem by algebra concepts.  You can assume more into the question by applying the rules of algebra.  In algebra, symbols are used instead of numbers.  This is part of the "math rules".  Then the other rules are used to find the answer.  The symbol ? is just as valid as x or y or whatever.  In science you sometimes even use words. (That is how word problems are built.)  Once you know the "math rules".  You can apply logic to solve math problems.

I send this answer to give you a deeper understanding of what you are doing.  You are learning basic rules now.  Knowing what is causing your confusion can make things easier in the future.  Jut play with the "ok" math maneuvers (+, -, multiplication, division) until you can do them without thinking.  And math will become easy.  There are more "math rules" that you will learn later.  You will "see" the answers easier later.  After you get more experience.  Don't expect this now.  The key to easy math is practice.

4 0
3 years ago
Like the land bridge people, what factors might have pulled the Solutreans into North America?
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

I think it is grasses and animals

Explanation:

Anthropologists have assumed that people came to the Americas because they were following food on the hoof.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is one way in which European economies changed as a result of the expansion and global trade during the 15th and 18th centu
    15·2 answers
  • Topics such as perception, thinking, and learning are studied by ________ psychologists.
    7·1 answer
  • Please help I need this question to be answered ASAP
    15·2 answers
  • According to erving goffman, the goal of a total institution is to
    9·1 answer
  • Which castle group would have to perform the most menial jobs?
    12·1 answer
  • American courts often make decisions by relying on the principle of stare decisis, meaning that they use the legal precedents se
    6·1 answer
  • Distansya ng pilipinas at australia<br>​
    13·1 answer
  • We should carry out our development by ourselves . justify this statement​
    11·2 answers
  • Determining when a particular identity becomes important for defining the self, as opposed to other identities is:
    8·1 answer
  • Which character gathers up the christmas trees for hogwarts every year?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!