<u>Embezzlement</u> is the theft or misuse of <u>company funds by executives </u>
Explanation:
<u>Embezzlement, refers to the act of withholding the assets of a company with the intention of conversion(theft) by one or more person to whom the assets where entrusted .It is a type of financial fraud</u>
Answer:
National Security Agency/Central Security Service
Explanation:
NSA is also one of the most important centers of foreign language analysis and research within the U.S. government and is said to be the largest employer of mathematicians in the United States and perhaps the world.
Your Welcome :)
I believe it’s the last one
Answer:
The legal parameters for patient rights are set by HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1966).
The laws give the patient some bills of rights, which cannot be denied to any person of sound mind.
These rights include the right to be treated respectfully and without discrimination, rights of privacy and personal access to medical records, rights of treatment refusal and choice, and the right to informed consent.
Explanation:
These patient rights ensure that Dr. S and Dr. V practice medicine ethically. They cannot divulge a patient's medical information without her consent. Every treatment and test to be administered to the patient must go with her consent. Dr. S and Dr. V cannot deny the patient access to her medical records. They are also not permitted to transfer her medical records to another person or institution without the patient's authorization. Dr. S and Dr. V must discuss the treatment and test, including any other information with the patient, to obtain her full consent before taking any action. They cannot bill the patient without discussing the cost of treatment.
When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to Judicial Restraint.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judicial branch is conferred with the power of interpretation of the law. Many times while exercising the power of judicial activism there is always a chance that justices may exceed their power. Hence, the theory of judicial restraint was evolved.
By judicial restraint, judges are encouraged to exercise their power with certain limits and to respect and follow stare decisis. This ensures that judges are not intruding into the realm of the legislature by involving themselves in law making.
