Answer:

Explanation: For this, it is often best to find the horizontal asymptote, and then take limits as x approaches the vertical asymptote and the end behaviours.
Well, we know there will be a horizontal asymptote at y = 0, because as x approaches infinite and negative infinite, the graph will shrink down closer and closer to 0, but never touch it. We call this a horizontal asymptote.
So we know that there is a restriction on the y-axis.
Now, since we know the end behaviours, let's find the asymptotic behaviours.
As x approaches the asymptote of 7⁻, then y would be diverging out to negative infinite.
As x approaches the asymptote at 7⁺, then y would be diverging out to negative infinite.
So, our range would be:
Answer:
There is about 4,164/4,165 chances of not getting getting a four of a kind. So, it is extremely unlikely or even borderline impossible in that situation to get a four of a kind.
<u>But in the long run, it can be increased only if you keep drawing. So, the awnser would have to be. D </u>
Step-by-step explanation:
A. It does mean that if you are dealt 4165 five‑card poker hands, one will be four‑of‑a‑kind.
B. It does not mean that all will be four‑of‑a‑kind. The probability is actually saying that only on the 4165 the poker hand will you get a four‑of‑a‑kind, not just on any of the 4165 poker hands.
C. The probability is actually saying that in the long run, with a large number of five‑card poker hands, the fraction in which you will be dealt a four‑of‑a‑kind is 1 / 4165.
D. The chance you will be dealt four‑of‑a‑kind is 1 / 4165 only on the first hand. This chance will then increase with each new hand you are dealt until you eventually win
The answer is on google no dumb stuff dummy
Step-by-step explanation:
okay so im in 8th grade and i just worked the problem out and i got , 809 ,
first you add 230 + 349 to see how much she has in her farm
she has 579, then you add 579 because she has that many , and he has 230 so you add 579 +230 and tou get 809
work:
230
+349
----------
579
+230
---------
809
hope i helped!!
Answer:
first and third
Step-by-step explanation:
Emma used the product instead of the quotient and forgot the parentheses in x-4.5