Are used to describe the basic characteristics of study populations and other data sources.

Boots Plus has two product lines: Hiking boots and Fashion boots. Income statement data for the most recent year follow: If $25,

GaryK [48]

Answer:

The missing part of the question is found below:

Boots Plus has two product lines: Hiking boots and Fashion boots. Income statement data for the most recent year follow:

Total Hiking Fashion

Sales revenue $480,000 $340,000 $140,000

Variable expenses 355,000 235,000 120,000

Contribution margin 125,000 105,000 20,000

Fixed expenses 76,000 38,000 38,000

Operating income (loss) $49,000 $67,000 $(18,000)

Answer

By discontinuing fashion line of business operating income would increase by $5,000

Explanation:

The impact of eliminating Fashion line is evident in the revised Income statement below:

Hiking

Sales revenue $340,000

Variable expenses ($235,000)

Contribution margin 105,000

Fixed expenses($76,000-$25,000) ($51,000)

Operating income $54,000

By discontinuing the fashion line of business,the operating income would increase by $5,000 ($54,000-$49,000) from $49,000 when operating the two lines of business to $54,000 when fashion is closed up.

The most appropriate action is to concentrate on the hiking line which might mean that Boots plus has a competitive edge in the Hiking business sector.

4 0

3 years ago

Scarlet Corporation, the parent corporation, has a basis of $600,000 in the stock of Brown Corporation, a subsidiary in which Sc

Anon25 [30]

Answer:

$950,000

Explanation:

As per IRS section 332, in the case when the parent company received a property when the complete liquidation of subsidiary company is done so the receipts of such property would not recorded either any loss or gain. Also the basis of the parent company assets would be carry over basis.

So here the basis would be $950,000

The same is to be considered

3 0

3 years ago

A debtor owed a creditor $1,200 on a promissory note that was due on August 1. After the debtor told the creditor that he might

Ilya [14]

Answer:

The correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as the options are omitted. The question is therefore completed before answering the question by providing the options as follows:

A. No, because the debtor incurred no additional detriment that would serve as consideration for the new agreement.

B. Yes, because it would have cost the creditor $1,200 to purchase the entertainment system himself.

C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

D. Yes, because the new agreement between the debtor and the creditor is enforceable with or without

Explanation of the answer is now provided as follows.

It is possible to enforce the two parties' new agreement as an accord.

An accord can be described as an agreement in which one party to an existing contract agrees to accept some other, different performance from the other party in lieu of the performance that the other party is obligated to provide. In principle, an agreement must be backed by payment, but the consideration can be less than the amount agreed upon in the preceding contract if it is of a different character or the claim is to be paid to a third party. The responsibility of the debtor to supply the creditor with a new entertainment system was enough fresh consideration to constitute a legal agreement in this case.

When a party's responsibility is modified in some way, as the debtor's duty was in this case, the preceding legal duty rule does not apply. It makes no difference whether the creditor's benefit in the accord arrangement is equal to the original debt's worth; courts will find appropriate consideration if the consideration is fresh or different in any way. The difference in the debtor's obligation, that is, payment is in the form of an entertainment system rather than cash) is enough to sustain the accord arrangement, regardless of how much the entertainment system would have cost the creditor.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) does not apply because the original agreement was not for the sale of goods. The underlying commitment in this case was to pay a debt secured by a promissory note.

Therefore, the correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

6 0

2 years ago

The definition of environmentalism is_____.

qwelly [4]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

because of the word "environmentalism" which gives meaning and purpose to the term as a group or movement.

8 0

2 years ago

Your client, Tom, asks you to prepare his financial statements. He is especially curious about his net worth. He asks you to exp

Vilka [71]

Answer: Balance sheet

Explanation: In simple words, balance sheet refers to the statement which is prepared by an entity at the end of the financial year for depicting its assets, liabilities and equity in hand at that particular point of time.

Balance sheet shows the net worth of an entity at the end of the year and can also be used to evaluate how much of the assets are funded with the capital and for how much any liability has been taken over.

Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct answer is balance sheet.

6 0

3 years ago