The answer for this question is the letter D
Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
<span>The answer to the question is false. While human activities are responsible for much of the eutrophication seen in bodies of water, it is not responsible for ALL of them. One example can be seen in stagnant water. Stagnant water collects more nutrients than moving water. The collection of nutrients from any source of stagnant water can cause an overgrowth or algae or phytoplankton, causing eutrophication.</span>
