Erikson's main idea of what happens if you do not master the conflict of a given age (the equivalent of a Freudian fixation) is identity crisis. Each conflict has two parts: the successful outcome one wants, and the negative outcome which comes from failing to master the conflict. Tye conflict of adolescence is identity vs confusion. If one should fail to master this conflict, they will be confused as to who they are, will not feel like they fit in, and will waver between varying personality types in an effort to discover their identity.
8 in 1816 & 1820
16 in 1824 & 1828
21 in 1832, 1836 & 1840
23 from 1844 through 1860
21 in 1864 & 1868
22 in 1872, 1876 & 1880
23 from 1884 through 1908
24 from 1912 through 1928
26 in 1932, 1936 & 1940
26 in 1964 & 1968
25 in 1972, 1976 & 1980
23 in 1984 & 1988
21 in 1992, 1996 & 2000
20 in 2004 & 2008
18 in 2012, 2016 & 2020
25 from 1944 through 1960
Marco is viewed by this family as "fictive kin".
We can define fictive kin as the individuals who are viewed as being a piece of a family despite the fact that they are not related by either blood or marriage bonds. Fictive kinship may tie individuals together in ties of love, concern, commitment, and obligation.
The term Fictive kinship may likewise be utilized as a part of a legitimate sense, and this utilization proceeds in social orders where these classes and definitions with respect to family relationship and social ties have lawful cash; e.g. in issues of legacy.
Answer: RACE
Explanation:
That is the variable factor here is the RACE of the men in the study.
Answer:
D No, because the citizenship requirement is not necessary to achieve a compelling state interest.
Explanation:
Option A is incorrect, because the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states power not granted to the federal government.
Option B is incorrect, because it states the standard that the Supreme Court has applied to primary and secondary school teachers.
Option C is also incorrect, because it states the wrong standard.
Hence, Option D is correct, because a state generally may not discriminate against aliens or foreigners absent a compelling state interest, and no compelling interest is served by prohibiting aliens or foreigners from teaching at a state university.
