Answer: your question is not complete. Please let me assume this to be your question.
Original Source Material:
There is a design methodology called rapid prototyping, which has been used successfully in software engineering. Given similarities between software design and instructional design, we argue that rapid prototyping is a viable method for instructional design, especially for computer-based instruction.
References:
Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31-44.
Student:
Tripp and Bichelmeyer (1990) suggested that rapid prototyping could be an advantageous methodology for developing innovative computer-based instruction. They noted that this approach has been used successfully in software engineering; hence, rapid prototyping could also be a viable method for instructional design due to many parallels between software design and instructional design.
References:
Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31-44.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
1. This is word to word plagiarism
2. This is paragraph plagiarism
3. This is not plagiarism.
ANSWER: 3. THIS IS NOT PLAGIARISM
Explanation: plagiarism is the act of using someone's literature work to achieve yours without acknowledging the authors of those literature work. The student has fully acknowledged the authors in his work, so it's not plagiarism. The student work and the original source seems to be the same because their have extracted the same knowledge from one source. The student has also converted the information into his own words, though similar to the main source because their reference the same book.
