Answer:
With this question, you need to see which side of the argument you support. Do you believe they should've gone to war or not?
Why?
I said I didn't support it because we solved the problem in a less destructive manner.
Explanation:
Just fill in the blanks with your opinion and facts to support your opinion.
Nobody can really tell you how to feel or answer these.
It's up to you and your opinion!
<span>A. People were more concerned about their farms and businesses
The decline of Puritans influence in New England could be explained with the help of various factors: there was the fact that the first generation of Puritans were elders and fewer man were joining. Then, with the K</span><span>ing Philips war, may puritans were killed, making the number of communities that were Puritans ever lower. New people coming from England and other colonies were more interested in being merchants, thus new leaders come, aggravating the decline of the Puritans.</span>
A) The Nuremberg Chronicle
Hope this helped!
Initially, McClellan was trusted a military leader. He was able to successful train and equip the US military against the Confederacy. His planning proved to be detailed however, his perfectionist qualities made him slow to move and often without the aggression needed to fight the Confederacy. His plan was, theoretically, a good one in which troops would move east and come at Virginia from the water. This attack was aimed right at Richmond and if successful would have ended the war.
