Answer: C. Reformation
Explanation: A non-compete agreement or clause is a legal binding entered into by two or more parties which restricts the parties from being in competition with the other usually through the sale of similar product. However, in the context above, since the non-compete clause has been breached by Jack, and the judge feels the time constraint in the clause was unreasonably long, The reformation process will be best to remediate the situation, which refers to the change or alteration of the terms of an existing document using the judicial process and requires the conformation of the parties involved.
Answer:
the project's MIRR is 13.84 %
Explanation:
MODIFIED INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (MIRR)
-It is the rate that causes the Present Value of the Terminal Value (Future Cash flows at the end of the Project) to equal Present Value of Cash outflows.
-MIRR assumes a reinvestment rate at the end of the project
The First Step is to Calculate the Terminal Value at end of year 3.
Terminal Value (FV) = Sum of (PV x (1 + r) ^ 3 - n)
= $450 x (1.09) ^ 2 + $450 x (1.09) ^ 1 + $450 x (1.09) ^ 0
= $534.65 + $490.50 + $450.00
= $1,475.15
The Next Step is to Calculate the MIRR using a Financial Calculator :
(-$1,000) CFj
0 CFj
0 CFj
$1,475.15 CFj
Shift IRR/Yr 13.84 %
Therefore, the project's MIRR is 13.84 %.
Answer:
The correct answer is telemarketing.
Explanation:
Telemarketing is a form of direct marketing in which an advisor uses the telephone or any other means of communication to contact potential customers and market products and services. Potential customers are identified and classified by various means such as their purchase history, previous surveys, participation in contests or job applications (for example, via the Internet). Names can also be purchased from another company's database or obtained from the phone book or other public or private list. The classification process serves to find those potential customers most likely to buy the products or services that the company in question offers.
Answer:
Option B is correct.
Explanation:
In order to answer this question correctly, we first need to understand the law of demands.
Law of demands: It says that the relationship of price and quantity demanded is inversely proportional. It means if the price of a particular product goes high, then the quantity of demand will be reduced. Similarly, if the price of the product is low then the quantity of demanded will be higher.
Here,
Option B is the most relevant to the Law of Demand which says that Kathleen eats more steak when the price is low. It means when the price is low, the quantity of steak demanded is higher in Kathleen's case. Furthermore, Kathleen eats less when the price is high. It means, when the price of steak is higher then the quantity of steak demanded from Kathleen is low.
Hence, Option B is the correct option which fulfills the law of demand.
