Answer:
CD: 41,500
Bonds: 49,500
Explanation:
Base on the information we are given, we can create an equation system:
The total investment in bonds and certificates of deposit totals 91,000
and the amount investment on bonds are 8,000 higher than Certificates of deposit
<u>We replace the bonds of the second equation on the first equation:</u>
CD + (CD + 8,000) = 91,000
<u>And solve for certificates of deposits</u>
2CD = 91,000 - 8,000
CD = 83,000/2 = 41,500
<u>Now, we replace the CD on the second equation</u>
Bonds = CD + 8,000
Bonds = 41,500 + 8,000 = 49,500
Answer:
A: $0
Explanation:
Holder in due course describes a person who has accepted a negotiable certificate in good faith.
It is one of the requirements by law for a holder in due course that it must not be aware of any defaults.
Since Happy Collection Agency knew about the default, it has no claim over the note.
Based on the amount the bicycle was sold for and the cost to produce, the return on investment was <u>23.5%. </u>
<h3>What was the return on investment?</h3>
This can be found by the formula:
= (Total Return – Amount Invested)/Amount Invested x 100%
Solving gives:
= (85 - 65) / 85 x 100%
= 20 / 85 x 100%
= 23.5%
In conclusion, this is 23.5%.
Find out more on return on investment at brainly.com/question/15726451.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Attend weekly staff meetings at the office.
Explanation:
Taking into account the nature of the organization (real estate sector), where sellers are assigned a quantity X of properties, they must usually account for their weekly activities. For which it is necessary to attend meetings held in order to assess trends, achievement of objectives, etc.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Recording the entire cost as expense would have understated retained earnings by $2,650,000
Annual depreciation on machine = ( Purchase cost - Residual value ) / Useful life
= ($2,650,000 - $165,000) / 9
= $2,485,000 / 9
= $276,111.11
Depreciation would have been recorded for $552,222 for 2 years had the machinery been corrected recorded I.e $276,111 × 2 = $552,222
Therefore , the cumulative effect of this error on the income statement of Sheridan for the year ended, 31 December 2021 would have shown
= $2,650,000 - $552,222
= $2,097,779