Answer:
Facial behavior has an innate, unlearned component.
Explanation:
The debate of nature vs. nurture is one of the most important ones in the social sciences. "Nature" states that some traits are innate to humans, and are already within us the moment we are born. On the other hand, "nurture" refers to the idea that it is society that teaches us some of our traits, and we adopt them based on our culture. What this research wants to show is that human facial behaviour has a component that is innate and unlearned.
<u>Answer:
</u>
According to eNotes, over-processing is the organizational waste that refers to doing work that is unnecessary or undesired and is a waste of time and resources.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When the financial gains that a particular work is going to dispense is not worth the time and resources that are being spent on it, the work can be deemed as over-processing waste.
- Hence, the term over-processing refers to the wastage of time, money, and other resources that are put in to get an output that is way too small as far as the input is concerned.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
I think Jim Braddock's winning streak inspired people so much because he is a good example of endurance, perseveration, and faith when difficult moments make people surrender. In his case, he never surrendered and worked hard to sustain his family during the difficult years of the Great Depression.
Those years of the Great Depression were tough ones. After the US stock market crash of October 219, 1929, millions of Americans lost their jobs, companies broke, and banks went into bankruptcy.
Braddock was a boxer that returned to the ring in 1935, after struggling during those difficult years, and won the championship.
His story is so inspirational even now because is an example of perseveration and endurance under difficult times. It is a history of how a man can overcome adversity if he is committed to doing what he needs to do in order to get what he wants, keeping the faith, and never, ever surrender.
The correct answer is, let’s take the cases of Mexico and Argentina.
Mexico has had a major change of power in the presidency in the last elections of 2018, with the victory of a left-sided party called MORENA. The Revolutionary Party (PRI) governed the country for 70 years. It lost the presidency for the first time in 2000 to the right-sided party called National Action (PAN). In 2012, and due to the bad conditions of the country, official national party PRI won again and had 6 disastrous years that made people angry. Andres Manuel Lopez from MORENA left-sided party won the elections in 2018 with a record-setting 53% of the votes.
The case of Argentina is more critical. The economic situation is very poor and people is getting angry. Since 1991 that the Argentina peso pegged the dollar, things have been worse. President Carlos Menem had two terms both the economic conditions did not improve. The next presidents, Fernando de la Rua and Nestor Kirchner couldn’t do so much and the economy stayed in recession. In a controversial decision, Cristina Kirchnner, wife of former president Nestor, won the election and at the end of her tenure, she was accused of mismanaging of national resources. Mauricio Macri is the actual President and has taken controversial measures that had reduced the money in people’s pockets.
