Answer:
Slaves where guaranteed freedom for fighting with the patriots
Explanation:
The slaves had a reward of freedom from their owners for fighting the patriots
The rhetorical techniques used by Thomas Paine in the Common Sense are ethos, logos, and pathos, as well as diction and syntax.
Paine is able to make the case that the United States should work toward their independence from England by utilising a constructed argument and rhetorical devices. The aim of Paine's essay was to persuade the colonies to declare their independence from Great Britain. His use of rhetorical questions and a simile to show unfair British policy is particularly powerful.
Paine makes use of it to create emotion, describe relationships, and provide contrasts or similarities. In this instance, he creates a list of what he considers to be Common Sense using syntax. He discusses how a man ought to be able to set aside all bias, concentrate on the most important issues, and extend his vision.
Know more about Thomas Paine here
brainly.com/question/16576227
#SPJ1
Answer:
1: France, England, Russia, and the U.S.
2: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire
3: Where the counties entered combat
Other #3: Britain and France against Germany
4:Germany against Russia
5: Italy and France against Germany and Austria-Hungary
6: the US fought in the western front because they could get to France on ships easily since air travel wasn't a thing yet
Explanation:
Info in the paragraph above questions
<span>the people/funds who buy government bonds,</span>
Answer:
Whether sociological studies can predict or improve society
Explanation:
The antipositivism proposes that social science researchers must first be aware that the concepts, ideas and language of research shape their perception of the social world under investigation. On the other hand, positivism believes that a theory can only be taken for granted if it is proven from valid scientific techniques.
According to these concepts, we can conclude that the difference between positivism and antipositivism is better represented by the option: "whether sociological studies can predict or improve society
".
