Answer: C) not liable, because the statement was an opinion.
Explanation:
Breach of contract is described as legal promise which is broken by a contract-involved party that is done between two or more parties to bind them into an agreement or contract to keep that lawful and formal promise
According to the question, Carlton is not legally answerable for Beth not getting well in a week because he gave a opinion in the form of belief that Beth can get well.As Carlton did not make a legal promise is cannot be considered liable for Beth not getting well.
Other options are incorrect because Carlton is not answerable to Beth's situation legally. Surgery can be considered for contract but in this case it is not lawful agreement. Beth is neither getting excused for paying Carlton .
Thus , the correct option is option(C).
ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ
<span>ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ</span>
The difference between a good deductive argument and a good non deductive argument is that of nature of premises.
The premises in deductive arguments guarantee the validity of the conclusion. On the other hand, the premises of non-deductive arguments do not imply that the conclusion is true. An argument that uses deductive reasoning presents premises—statements that are presumptively true or known to be true—for a conclusion that logically derives from those premises. Deductive arguments makes assumptions about what is already known in order to deduce truths about related conclusions. Which is not true in the case of non- deductive arguments. An argument that uses its premises to provide likely, but not definitive, support for its conclusions is known as a non-deductive argument.
To know more about deductive arguments, click here:
brainly.com/question/13004858
#SPJ4
Answer:
thank you
i have to get on my homework sadly :'(
Explanation: