Answer:
B) Thoughts anf Facts
Explanation:
U 2 can help me by marking as brainliest.........
Answer:
Explanation:
X - number of units sold
Total cost for production = 1,500,000 + 1600X
Total cost for purchasing = 2000X
a. For 4000 units sold
Total cost for production = 1,500,000 + 1600 * 4000 = $7,900,000
Total cost for purchasing = 2000* 4000 = $8,000,000
In this case producing is cheaper. Therefore, it is better to produce
b. Y - break-even point
Then : 1,500,000 + 1600 * Y = 2000* Y
So 1,500,000 = 400 Y
Y = 3750
At №of units less than 3750 purchasing will be the better option
And above 3750 producing will be the better option
Answer:
Anne Mullens committed embezzlement.
Explanation:
Embezzlement is defined as misappropriation of funds by someone with whom funds have been entrusted.
It is a theft as the money does not belong to the perpetrator. The perpetrator is only entrusted with funds.
One of the conditions for embezzlement is an existence of a fiduciary (trust) relationship between parties.
In the given case, Anne Mullens pocketed $57 cash from recorded amount instead of recording 57$ customer's payment via check. Instead she included the customer's check in the money to be taken to bank.
This is embezzlement of funds by Anne.
Answer:
The primary difference between those two concepts is focus that each term has. The first one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the level of return. While the second one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the amount of factors used for that production.
Explanation:
One the one hand, the law of diminishing marginal returns is a concept known in the microeconomics theory due to the fact that it establishes the relationship between the productivity and the income for every aspect of it. Meaning that, when the productivity increases because of the increase of only one factor of production then the income will start to slowly decrease, confirming that when only one factor is increased the production will start to be incomplete and the return will decrease for that.
On the other hand, the law of diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution indicates the relationship between the level of output and the different factor used to produce. Meaning that, it shows how to keep the level of output the same while making changes in the amount of factors used.
Answer:
a. 5.819 million
b. $709918
Explanation:
Below is the calculation:
a. Total number of adult population = 253 million
Total employed adult = 253 x 59.7% = 151.041
Number of employed adult after increase in employment rate = 253 x 62% = 156.86
More people would be working = 156.86 - 151.041 = 5.819 million
b. GDP per capita is $122,000, so increase in GDP = 5.819 x 122000
Increase in GDP = $709918
