What are the main differences between New Freedom and New Nationalism

1 answer:

3 0

Roosevelt returned to the United States in the summer of 1910 and began a speechmaking tour across the nation. He touted a new wide-ranging program of progressive reform called The New Nationalism. This broad plan called for reform in every area of American life, with the notable exception of race relations. The ideas behind The New Nationalism required involvement by the national government in many areas of American life. This was a total rejection of laissez-faire government. Roosevelt argued that the nation needed change and that it was going to take the federal government to get it done.

You might be interested in

Rules for blockade-running were passed by the confederacy to ensure:

Crazy boy [7]

Delivery of war supplies and delegating certain space for commercial uses.

8 0

2 years ago

How did income inequality in the 1920s contribute to the Great Depression?

tia_tia [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

Millions of farmers defaulted on their debts, placing tremendous pressure on the banking system. Between 1920 and 1929, more than 5,000 of the country's 30,000 banks failed. ... A poor distribution of income compounded the country's economic problems

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When Virginia and Kentucky in the late 1700s and South Carolina in the 1830s refused to follow federal law they were practicing

Natali [406]

Your best answer choice would be B) nullification the states of Virginia and Kentucky both stated that they would ignore the laws of federal government in response to the passage of the alien and sedition acts.

5 0

2 years ago

What were the positive and negative effects of british imperialism in india

ozzi

Answer:

Positive effects - Great Britain brought its political and industrialist points of view. In this way,railroads were built, bridges and cities were modernized In a nutshell, India saw an increased development (especially in industrialization). The same happens with the administration, and the conflict between the local leaders became less common.

Negative effects - we can't forget that India was under control of an imperialist country, and because of that, indian villages were not self control, and everything was determined by the British government.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Which resulted from the Senate's not guilty verdict in Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial?

In-s [12.5K]

The correct answer is D. The three branches of government remained equal in power. Because the impeachment failed, there were initiatives and petitions to change the system from having a president with all executive powers, to creating a body of people who shared executive power. This never passed and everything remained the same as normal.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers