Answer:
$29,050
Explanation:
The computation of the residual income is shown below:
Residual income = Net operating income - Minimum required income
= $83,000 - $53,950
= $29,050
Here
Minimum required income = Average operating assets × Minimum required rate of return
= $415,000 × 13%
= $53,950
This should be the answer and the options provided are wrong
Answer:
Terminate his employment
Explanation:
Based on the fact and information, Tibbits should be discharged from employment for his failure to disclose this relevant conviction. As a convicted offender, he is considered in the eyes of the law to be high-risk and should not be allowed to enter unsuspecting clients’ homes. It would be the company's liability if he acts non professionally and inappropriately at a jobsite.
Answer:
the investment advisor should do nothing
Explanation:
In the scenario that is being described, the investment advisor should do nothing. This is because the investment advisor did nothing wrong or illegal, he simply followed the instructions that were strictly provided by the clients, therefore acting in accordance with the customers' wishes. Meaning that he has nothing to fear from the client's being accept because they have no standing to take legal action against the advisor.
Answer:
Informing client of Accenture's firewall smart an innovative technology deployed right from the off in other to check and prevent security throughout the integration process.
Explanation:
Accentre should tell client about the companies model on how they intend to tackle such security concerns associated with the cloud. This is what a client whose fear is about security wants to hear. Once, Accenture explains how to the client about their early integration framework coupled with innovative technologies and firewalls geared at checking and preventing security breach, the client should be convinced and his fears allayed.
Answer:
(g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Increase in price of typical soda = 10 cents
Total consumed = 150,000 sodas [er day
Dropped quantity = 75,000 sodas
So by considering the above information, the per day compensating variation of the tax varies from 0 and - 7,500
Since the sugar sweetened sodas is treated as a normal goods. Moreover, people can substitute the other goods also if there is an increase in a price of the good
The -7,500 is come from = (-75,000 × 0.10)
The options are as follows
(a) Greater than -$15k because soda is a luxury good with income (b) -$15k because that is the old consumption level times the value of the tax (c) Between -S7.5k and -$15k because soda is a luxury good elasticity > 1 with income elasticity >1 (d) Between -$7.5k arti -$15k because residents can substitute to other products (e) -$7.5k because that is the new consumption level times the value of the tax ()-$7.5k because that is the change in consumption times the value of the tax (g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products (h) Between 0 and -$7.5k because because beverages are typically necessity goods with 6) Nothing because there was no effect on income G) It is impossible to say without knowing consumers' marginal rate of substitution income elasticity less than 1
