<span>1) - we see here that each college is different, so the answer is that they are not competitive because they are not not homogenous - since they can for example not all offer the same courses 2) This is a monopoly - they have the exclusive right to provide some service! it's not a competetive market (other companies don't have free entry). 3) Here there are not too many sellers - it's just a few companies, so people alsco can't choose from too many options. 4) this is a true competitive market - it has a free entry, many sellers and the product is homogenous!</span>
Answer:
option D - $22,000 gain
Explanation:
the gain can be calculated by using the following relation
Face Value + Unamortized Premium - Purchase Price = gain
where,
Face Value - $1,000,000
Unamortized Premium - 60% x $20,000
Purchase Price - 99% x $1,000,000
putting all value to get gain or loss on the retirement
= $1,000,000 + (60% x $20,000) - (99% x $1,000,000)
= $22,000 gain
Answer:
A. National-security argument
Explanation:
The National-security argument is also known as the National-defense argument. The argument proposes the imposition of high tariffs on locally manufactured goods so that the country would not be dependent on other countries for those goods in the event of war. For example, if a country is dependent on other counties for the production of food, then it would be in great danger in the advent of war. Tires that are also used to prepare weapons should be sourced within a country so that in the advent of war, the country would not be dependent on others.
This is the argument employed by the congresswoman who sought the imposition of a tariff on tires so that the United States would not be dependent on other foreign countries during a war.
Answer:
tell her to make extra!
Explanation:
you can use excuses such as wanting to pack leftovers for a meal the next day, or saying you're extra hungry
