Answer:
Please consider the following explanation.
Explanation:
Bob is correct in this case as Penny didn't make a claim that the goods were non-conforming. Penny is incorrect. Since there was no claim of non conformance, Bob doesn't have to refund the $3.000.
Answer: C. $40 million.
Explanation:
By granting them 15 million shares subject to forfeiture if employment is terminated within three years, the company is compensating them.
The total amount that they will be compensated with has to be apportioned over the 3 years as an expense that will reduce earnings per year.
Total compensation = No. of shares * fair value of shares
= 15,000,000 * 8
= $120,000,000
Apportioned over 3 years;
= 120,000,000/3
= $40,000,000
Answer: Macro
Explanation:
This is a macro distinction as the producers of soybean in America are concerned about the crop grown in South America as it will affect the overall price level of soybean in America. When the weather in South America is favorable and the crop produce is large, the supply curve for soybean will shift to the left driving down the overall price level of soybean in America.
Thus, because the concern here is about the overall produce and overall price level it is a macro distinction.
Answer:
Cost per unit under variable costing $
Direct material 110
Direct labour 150
Variable manufacturing overhead <u> 75 </u>
Cost per unit <u>335 </u>
<u />
Cost per unit under absorption costing $
Direct material 110
Direct labour 150
Variable manufacturing overhead 75
Fixed manufacturing overhead ($2,700,000/90,000) <u>30</u>
Cost per unit <u>365</u>
Explanation:
In variable costing, cost per unit is calculated by the addition of all variable costs while in absorption costing, fixed manufacturing overhead application rate is added to the variable costs in order to obtain the cost per unit.
