How was life before the industrial revolution different from the life after it

2 answers:

8 0

Before the Revolution there were no good cars and everything was mostly done by hand after the IR everything was mostly done by machine. So here's a easy way to remember it before: MM after :MM so it's before : man made and after: machine made

Pani-rosa [81]3 years ago

7 0

Before the industrial revolution crops were pick by hand and it was a very hard task. verse after factories and different opportunities gave individuals more equipment and help that they can use.

You might be interested in

Why did the power of chiefs decline? Their groups adopted new power structures. Their groups wanted European leaders. Their grou

Helga [31]

Answer:

Their groups adopted new power structures.

Explanation:

In the old days, they traditional settings in a given place is done in such a way that, the people are under the authority of traditional leaders called the Chiefs. This so called Chiefs wields enormous power and determine what happens in their domain.

With the coming of the colonists, their power to make and implement policies where taken away by them. They rather take advice from the colonial masters which they implement on their area.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which factors appear to be responsible for the delay action by the international community in response to the genocide in Rwanda

ryzh [129]

On August 5, 2008, an independent Rwandan commission said France was aware of preparations for the 1994 Rwanda genocide and helped train the ethnic Hutu<span> militia perpetrators. It accuses France of training </span>Hutu<span> militias responsible for the slaughter, helping plan the genocide, and participating in the killings.</span>

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the second case in which the u. S. Supreme court employed the power of judicial review to overthrow a federal law or par

inysia [295]

After using its judicial review authority in the Marbury case, the Supreme Court for the next 50 years refrained from overturning any federal laws. In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court finally did so (1857).

A judge analyses the legality of a public body's decision or action in a court case called judicial review. To put it another way, court reviews focus more on the process of decision-making than the merits or shortcomings of the outcome.

The Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856; decided 1857) that all Americans of African heritage, whether free or slave, were not citizens of the United States and could not file lawsuits in federal court. The Court further determined that Congress lacked the authority to outlaw slavery in American territories.

Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), unquestionably the most contentious judgement the US Supreme Court has ever made, and also one of the most significant cases in US constitutional history.

It was the first Supreme Court decision to invalidate a federal legislation since Marbury v. Madison, in Cass Sunstein's words.

Since Marbury established judicial review in the context of a jurisdictional refusal, Dred Scott might be considered the first legitimate application of the judicial review power. In addition, it was "one of the first significant cases using the unambiguous term 'purpose of the framers.'

To know more about Supreme Court, visit:

brainly.com/question/15111973

#SPJ4

6 0

9 months ago

Which Hindu belief focuses on the effect of a person's actions in this and in previous lives?

Aliun [14]

Answer:

BRUH IT IS D OKAY TRUST ME

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago